California Governor Gavin Newsom will face a recall election, if current official signature totals hold.
“The effort to recall Governor Gavin Newsom has submitted enough verified signatures to qualify for a recall election, according to an update from the California Secretary of State’s office,” ABC reported. “The latest update says 1,626,042 signatures have been submitted and verified. To qualify, they needed 1.495 million signatures.”
“Counties still have until April 29 to submit the rest of the verified signatures and that will then be followed by a 30-day period where people can withdraw their signatures,” the report continued. “Former State Senator Don Perata has launched an effort — called ‘Stop the Steal’ — to encourage people to remove their names from the petition.”
“However, even Newsom’s team believes it is unlikely the effort will ultimately be successful in blocking the recall,” the report added.
Former San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer, San Diego businessman and former gubernatorial candidate John Cox, and celebrity activist Caitlyn Jenner are all interested in challenging Newsom for the job of California Governor.
The petition “Rescue California” gathered over 1.5 million signatures, enough to qualify to put his recall up for a vote; but there has been some uncertainty due to the State of California’s effort to throw out as many signatures as possible.
After once being considered a rising star in the Democratic Party, Gavin Newsom has experienced a fall from grace, even among rank-and-file Democratic voters. The left-leaning website FiveThirtyEight captures the reasons for his falling support, while pointing out that this would be the sixth time the state would see a recall election:
Timing and increased discontent with Newsom’s leadership — both, coincidentally, byproducts of the COVID-19 pandemic. After earning rave reviews early in the pandemic, Newsom is now under heavy fire, even from allies, for his handling of the coronavirus. He went back and forth over the legislature’s proposed vaccination rules and has struggled to convince teachers and administrators to reopen schools. California has also changed its vaccine distribution plan several times since vaccines became available, catching some providers unprepared, and currently ranks 39th among the 50 states in terms of percentage of doses administered. And his policy on lockdowns has pleased no one: Conservatives have accused him of strangling the economy with restrictions on businesses, while public-health experts have criticized his decision last month to lift regional stay-at-home orders as premature. […]
Governor Newsom’s heavy-handed lockdowns and personal hypocrisy during the pandemic fueled public outrage. The recall election would be an early litmus test for politicians who misled the public during the lockdowns and mask mandates ahead of the 2022 election.
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.