Excerpted from comments on previous DollarCollapse.com posts:
Although I agree that “non-custodial, decentralized forms of money” are a wise thing to have in general, it should be clear that it was the centralization of the payment system to the “truckers” that enabled the accounts to be frozen. That is how the demonstrators and supporters were identified to begin with. Had they not been identifiable, their assets could not have been frozen.
Supporting future protests or other groups or causes has suddenly become a challenge. How can money be contributed by many and then in turn distributed as needed if governments can retroactively label donations as criminal acts?
The real solution should deal with the original cause of the problem, which is governments’ ability to control financial assets via willing third parties. If indeed the ability to transact is required to enable Constitutional rights then “laws” like an “Emergencies Act” should not be allowed on Constitutional grounds.
The First Amendment (of the US Constitution):
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Therefore ANYTHING that “ABRIDGES THE FREEDOM … TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES,” is unConstitutional, including – obviously – the “freezing” of an individual’s assets.
Getting out of financial institutions now could be good timing, allowing you to avoid losses from the coming crash. Think of it as a form of diversification; some money institutional and the rest not.
But what’s interesting to me politically is who knows or really cares about what has happened in Canada. It’s possible that a majority of people worldwide don’t care – or even know about it – because they may think such things as financial assets seizures, or any other governmental attempts to control them, will never happen. They don’t intend to oppose their government so see no reason for their government to act against them.
And I’m not talking about just the ignoramuses in society (like the ones who voted for “Biden” in the US, or Trudeau, or fell for all the covid hysteria) who may live under the radar, but even those supposedly sophisticated people with significant money entrenched in the system.
In other words, it may still be possible to oppose government controls in principle while not worrying about them personally.
Here’s a real-life story about why cryptocurrencies suck.
I opened an “In Case I’m Wrong” account at CoinBase.com and planned to buy $100/week of Bitcoin against my better judgment. So just today I tried to buy another hundred dollars “worth” but was told that function has been disabled. I’ve tried to get help but they insist on me downloading Google something-or-other and showing both sides of my driver’s license, then sending a picture of my face, making sure the picture is clear and has good lighting, along with my email and password, after I change the password since I “signed in” to the account more than the allowed times in one day (which I did not). After that, someone will contact me within 24 hours to see why I can’t buy – or sell – bitcoin.
In one of my many chat sessions about this I was told I had no choice in the matter “to protect the community.” Finally I just said, “Forget it. This is ridiculous. How can I get my money back?” They said I couldn’t unless I downloaded Google’s blah, blah, blah.
It’s all even more of a numbers game than I suspected. I wouldn’t be surprised to see a rush to the exits soon as enough people run into this crap.
As far as I’m concerned, I’ve lost whatever my current balance has shrunk to. I’m not going to do all that just to fix “the glitch”. It could happen any time again, and I can only imagine if it happens to a lot of people all at the same time.
Crypto’s selling points were:
1) it’s anonymous.
2) it’s extremely liquid.
3) governments don’t know you have it & can’t seize it.
1) The “anonymous ” claim is true – supposedly – within the bitcoin/blockchain network itself. The problem is the entry and exit points. That’s where all the shenanigans can occur.
2) Well, it may be liquid in theory, if a long list of things align. Ask someone like me and I’d say in practice it’s not so much.
3) This is ridiculous. Again, the blockchain network may be anonymous but not the entry/exit exchanges. Of course “governments” know because that’s what the coveted Wall Street “regulations” imply.
As for seizures, I’m not sure how likely that could be, but it’s probably more likely than, say, bank seizures because it’s still a fringe area. Furthermore, if a lot of “bitcoin millionaires” are advertised, given the cultural environment we’re in seizures would probably be politically popular, especially to Democrats. Envy is an underlying theme in a lot of the cultural assaults going on.
Bruce C runs Miami-based Calder Construction.
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.