New Unseen Emails: Does This Heated Exchange Suggest Hunter’s Deals Were Too Dirty For His Business Associate?

Eric Schwerin pictured with Joe Biden. Source: Burisma

Revolver News has obtained screenshots of unpublished emails from Hunter’s hard drive suggesting a dramatic falling out between Hunter and his business partner:

The substance of this email pertains to Hunter’s holdings in a Chinese private equity firm BHR. Revolver has covered BHR in previous articles as follows:

There is no apparent reason for HUNTER’s participation in the BHR partnership other than political payoff and influence. Virtually all financial investors or partners are state policy entities, state owned entities, or only nominally private. The investments flow primarily to Chinese state backed projects or firms. The financial terms, where we have been able to locate specific deal terms, engage in non-normal business practices designed to funnel fees and assets to benefit a specific party.

BHR is a state managed operation. Leading shareholder Bohai is a Bank of China subsidiary, and BHR’s partners are Chinese State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) that funnel revenue/assets to BHR[Revolver]

Here, Hunter’s business partner Eric Schwerin acknowledges the existence of special loans from BHR to US shareholders. The obvious question is, did all US shareholders get such loans, or only special shareholders? And what makes the special shareholders special? It is interesting that Eric Schwerin goes out of his way to attribute this to Hunter in writing.

Eric Schwerin demonstrates a curious eagerness to pay back the $150k BHR loan. It is not clear that this is from disbursements as described in the previous mail. A source has suggested to Revolver News that Eric became concerned with the nature of the loans and wanted to wrap up his own personal involvement with BHR. This is merely informed speculation, but it is consistent with other e-mails from Schwerin that Revolver staff has seen.

The following e-mail suggests Schwerin is ready to be done with Hunter, offering to buy him out of the Rosemont Seneca Partnership entirely:

Hunter’s reply to the e-mail suggests a strained relationship to say the least.

Whatever the reason for Schwerin’s falling out with Hunter Biden, it underscores the pattern whereby just about everyone who has done business with Hunter either despises him, is in jail, or both.

This raises a question as to Hunter’s relationship with business partner Christopher Heinz. Heinz is the son-in-law of former Senator and Secretary of State John Kerry. The firm mentioned in the email, Rosemont Seneca, is named after the Heinz family farm.

Inquiring minds would like to know the status of Christopher Heinz, how his relationship with Hunter has developed, and what if any culpability Heinz might have in the shady dealings with Rosemont and BHR. Revolver staff is actively investigating, and readers can expect prompt updates if and when we obtain more emails that offer insight into Hunter’s business dealings.


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.