Whistleblower Says FBI Has Created ‘Orwellian Atmosphere’ to Silence Dissent
FBI Special Agent Garret O’Boyle said during a House Judiciary Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government hearing that the bureau engaged in a “smear campaign” against him, noting in a subsequent interview with Fox News that there are many agents who support his allegations but are “too afraid” to speak out.
“Too many in the FBI aren’t willing to sacrifice for the hard right over the easy wrong,” he said during the May 18 committee hearing. “They see what becomes of whistleblowers, how the FBI destroys their careers, suspends them under false pretenses, takes their security clearance and pay with no true options for real recourse or remedy.
“This is by design. It creates an Orwellian atmosphere that silences opposition and discussion.”
The FBI denies having acted in a retaliatory manner against whistleblowers, the agency told The Epoch Times.
“The FBI’s mission is to uphold the Constitution and protect the American people,” an FBI spokesperson said last week. “The FBI has not and will not retaliate against individuals who make protected whistleblower disclosures.”
O’Boyle, Special Agent Stephen Friend, Supervisory Intelligence Analyst George Hill, Staff Operations Specialist Marcus Allen, and other unnamed whistleblowers have alleged that the FBI is beset by politicization and that top officials are targeting agents for having conservative political beliefs, according to a Judiciary panel report.
“I couldn’t knowingly and silently continue on this path without speaking out against the weaponization I witnessed,” O’Boyle said.
“All I wanted to do was serve my country by stopping bad guys and protecting the innocent. To my chagrin, bad guys have begun running parts of the government, making it difficult to continue to serve this nation.”
The 78-page report by the House panel states that O’Boyle and Friend were both suspended indefinitely for making disclosures to Congress after their supervisors ignored their concerns about possibly illegal conduct within the FBI.
After being transferred to a Virginia field office from Kansas, O’Boyle was suspended during his first day on the job, he also said during the hearing, noting that he was forced to borrow clothing for his children as his family’s belongings were allegedly locked away in an FBI facility.
Others testified about their personal struggles, including not being able to find employment elsewhere and struggling to support their loved ones and young children while their cases were being investigated.
“I sacrificed my dream job to share this information with the American people,” Friend testified. “I humbly ask all the members to do your jobs and consider the merit of what I have presented.”
But Democrats dismissed the testimony, calling the hearing another attempt by Republicans on the committee to help former President Donald Trump.
“This select committee is a clearinghouse for testing conspiracy theories for Donald Trump to use in his 2024 presidential campaign,” Rep. Stacey Plaskett (D-Virgin Islands), a nonvoting member of the House who’s the ranking Democratic member of the committee.
Another member of the committee, Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.), a former House impeachment lawyer, questioned both Friend and O’Boyle about allegations of whether they received donations from former Trump official Kash Patel.
“My wife had lost her job, and it was Christmastime. So I don’t think that accepting charity is something I was proud to do,” Friend said. “I think that any sort of allegation that I gave up a very lucrative career in order to accept a donation several months later from an individual who I’ve never met in my entire life is quite frankly laughable.”
Ahead of the committee meeting, FBI Acting Assistant Director Christopher Dunham said in a letter that Friend refused to participate in a SWAT team arrest of a suspect in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol breach in Florida and had espoused an “alternative narrative” about the breach. Friend said a SWAT team wasn’t needed.
“I’ve arrested over 150 violent criminals in my career; I’ve never required a SWAT team to do it,” Friend replied, in response to questions from Rep. Debbie Wasserman Shultz (D-Fla.).
Dunham’s report, which was first reported on by The New York Times, also alleged that one of the whistleblowers “knowingly entered a restricted zone around the U.S. Capitol” and “was present in an area close to protestors clashing with Capitol Police” during the Jan. 6, 2021, breach.
“[That individual] remained in the restricted area even after what he believed was a deployment of tear gas and/or pepper spray, after witnessing protestors struggling with law enforcement trying to maintain barriers and eventually retreating due to protestor activity, and then immediately thereafter witnessing protestors climbing onto scaffolding. These actions showed a serious lack of judgment,” the letter reads.
It also said the individual “failed to report his presence near the Capitol on January 6 to the Security Division, even after being warned by his supervisor to do so.”
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply