The midterms are coming. If we have them – if they aren’t completely jiggered with – what is the likely outcome?
It could prove to be the beginning of the final outcome.
If the Left loses, the Left will lose it. For all of the Left’s leg-humping of “our Democracy,” what the Left really “humps” is its control of the apparatus of government , which the Left regards as the sole fief of the Left.
If the voters decide it isn’t, the Left will lose interest in “democracy” as quickly as Dracula would lose interest in a mannequin he bit into, thinking it was his next warm meal. Interest will surge in questioning elections, a thing the Left opposes when elections of Leftists are questioned. But unlike those who’ve questioned the workings – and so, the results – of the last election, those who question the results of this one (assuming they aren’t in line with “our Democracy”) will not do so peacefully. The Left being “peaceful” like OJ is innocent.
When the Left doesn’t get what it wants, it explodes. It attacks. Viz, the “peaceful” protests of the Left during Trump’s last year in office. Viz, the attempted assassination of a Supreme Curt Justice the Left doesn’t like, despite his having been nominated to the court by a president elected . . . democratically.
Viz, the “sport” – exclusively practiced by Leftists – of cold-cocking people in the streets, pushing them off subway platforms and onto the tracks.
Expect such “sports” to become more popular in the event “our Democracy” rejects the Left at the ballot box in a couple of weeks.
But also expect more than that. Especially if, as is expected, the Orange Man announces he will be running for office in the next election, in the wake of a rejection this election of the Left by . . .”our Democracy.”
Keeping in mind that the Left would still control the apparatus of “our Democracy” for at least the next couple of months after its repudiation at the polls. What do you suppose the Left will do with those two months? Keeping in mind that the Left – unlike the opposition to it – never goes gently into that good night.
Several likely scenarios come to mind.
The first is that the Left repudiates the results of the elections – just as the Left repudiated the election back in 2016 of the Orange Man, whom the Left immediately characterized as “illegitimate.” But the Left lacked the power to do anything about it at the time. Well, to do anything about it in a direct way, Indirectly, Leftists used every tool at their disposal, including the FBI and the media (including what is styled “social media”) to undermine the “illegitimate” president. They eventually succeeded in getting rid of him via a “pandemic” that he wasn’t astute enough to understand was designed to get rid of him.
Now, it is likely they will indict him – regardless of this election’s outcome – but much more probably if the results do not jibe with “our Democracy.” The Left will use its waning power to hound the single greatest threat it perceives to “our Democracy.” That being the democratic re-election of the man who probably won the last election.
And that may just trigger the violence the Left uses as reflexively as a carpenter uses a framing hammer.
The post-election indictment of the Orange Man – or the repudiation of the election’s results, if they do not jibe with “our Democracy” – could spark what many ruefully consider to be inevitable.
That being a repudiation of this no-longer-tenable system.
It is no longer tenable because of irreconcilable differences. Because of the Left’s insistence that everything that isn’t to the liking of Leftists constitutes a “threat” to “our Democracy.” A “threat” that must be met with violence – including economic violence. Viz, the threat by the Leftists who control PayPal to “fine” account holders who question “our Democracy,” the “threat” defined by the Left as anything the Left dislikes. The “fines” being outright seizures of peoples’ money – by a private company operating as the enforcement division of the Leftists who control the government.
And to use the force of government to force parents to submit their children for “vaccination.”
There are all too many things to viz – all of them making it plain the Left will not abide anything – or anyone – not in line with the Left.
Regardless of the “democratic” process.
This is understood. It is what comes next that must be fleshed out. That being, how to separate from the Left. In politics, that word has come to be associated with “seditious” things. But why should it be? The American colonies separated from Great Britain – and this has been celebrated every year since. The states of the Southern Confederacy attempted to do the same and – had they been allowed to go in peace – it is probable there’d be a lot more peace today. If only because people would have a peaceful alternative. Those who wanted to live in a “union” held together by force would be free to do so. Those who preferred to live in a different kind of place would be free to do so.
Of a piece with a man and wife who realize they can no longer live together except by forcing themselves on each other. Far better for them both to be free to choose new partners and a different kind of life.
You might even call that “democracy.”
. . .
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.