Could taking control of the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, be one of the main reasons why Iran is being targeted by Israeli and Western powers? As tensions build all the way up to an unthinkable war with Iran, it is interesting to study the Iranian banking system compared to its American, British and Israeli counterparts.
Some researchers point out that Iran is one of three countries in the world whose central bank is not under the control of the Rothschilds octopus. Before September 11, there were seven: Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran. In 2003, however, Afghanistan and Iraq were engulfed by the Rothschild octopus, and in 2011 the Sudan and Libya have also fallen. In Libya, a Rothschild bank was established in Benghazi while the country was still at war.
Islam forbids the charging of interest or usury, a major problem for the Rothschild banking system. A few hundred years ago, interest charges were also prohibited in the Christian world and were even punishable by death. This was seen as exploitation and enslavement (still is…)
Since the Rothschilds took control of the Bank of England around 1815, they extended their banking control all over the world. Their method consists in corrupting politicians into accepting enormous loans that no nations can’t possibly repay, and thus getting indebted to the Rothschild banking power to the point of surrendering the nation’s assets. Should a leader refuse to accept the loan, he is often ousted or assassinated. And if that fails, invasions may follow, and then a Rothschild central bank based on usury is established…
The Rothschilds exert powerful influence on the major news agencies in the world. The masses are repeatedly duped into believing horror stories about evil villains like Iran and North Korea. The Rothschilds control the Bank of England, the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, the IMF, the World Bank and the Bank for International Settlements. In addition, they possess most of the gold in the world and control the London Gold Exchange, which sets the price of gold on a daily basis. It seems that the family owns more than half of the world’s wealth – estimated by Credit Suisse to 231 trillion dollars – and is headed by Evelyn de Rothschild, the current head of the family.
Objective thinkers insist that Iran is not demonized because of its perceived nuclear threat, as the Taliban’s Afghanistan, Saddam Hussein’s Iraq and Muammar Gaddafi’s Libya were not a threat either
What then is the real reason? Is it to make trillions through oil profits and a protracted war? Is it to push the U.S. economy into bankruptcy, to start the Third World War and an opportunity to reduce much of the human population? To destroy the enemies of Israel, or to destroy the Iranian central bank, so there is no one to challenge the Rothschild banking racket?
Or could Iran simply be a stepping stone to the conquest of the Caucasus?
Zbigniew Brzezinski, a geopolitical strategist and member of the powerful CFR describes in his book “The Grand Chessboard”, that Central Asia has long been a geostrategic location simply because of its proximity to several great powers on the Eurasian landmass. The region itself never held a dominant stationary population nor could any of them use the natural resources. Also, it is rarely been, throughout history, the seat of power for an empire or influential state. Like Poland throughout European history, Central Asia was divided, re-divided, conquered out of existence, and fragmented repeatedly. Central Asia was the host to many battlefields for outside powers, rather than a power in its own right.
The conquest of the Eurasian landmass and its resources is essential to control the eastern and Asian blocks, it allows control of all commercial routes, maritime or land pipelines, therefore closing the loop with an already tamed West. The conquest of Central Asia clearly facilitates the centuries in the making design for a one World Dominion.
The nuclear threat only serves as a cover to persuade the global population of the perceived merits of yet another military action. Ironically, the populations of the world are adamantly opposed to more wars, so lighting the match will probably fall on Israel’s hands at the cost of renewed anti-Semitism.
The war mongers can get away with it unless we unify our voices into expressing our strongest disapproval as the drums of war get louder.
The prospect of a one world tyranny is not acceptable!